Would a Loving God Send People to Hell?
Reconciling Divine Love and Justice in the Hardest Doctrine of Christianity
The topic of hell is difficult.
It's emotionally weighty, and for many, it feels like an inescapable contradiction: How can a God who claims to love unconditionally also allow a place of eternal punishment to exist? Wouldn’t love demand forgiveness—or at least a softer alternative?
The Bible itself names this tension. God says through the prophet Ezekiel, “I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked” (Ezekiel 33:11). This isn’t a God delighting in condemnation; this is a God eager for people to turn and live.
With this as our backdrop, we need also to understand that God’s love and God’s justice are not opposing forces. They are, in fact, essential aspects of the same holy character. The apostle John tells us “God is love” (1 John 4:8). But this same God is also “holy, holy, holy” (Isaiah 6:3) and a “God of justice” (Deuteronomy 32:4).
Love without justice is sentimentality; justice without love is cruelty.
But in God, love and justice meet—and they do so most completely at the cross. It’s there we see that His justice isn’t in conflict with His love, but an expression of it. After all, if God never punished evil, could we call Him loving toward victims of evil?
We instinctively know that real love doesn’t ignore wrongdoing. A judge who refuses to punish a violent criminal isn’t loving—he’s negligent. Similarly, God’s justice means evil doesn’t get the last word. Hell, then, is not arbitrary vengeance. It is God’s solemn act of final separation—of quarantining evil so that redeemed people, places, and things can flourish in purity and peace (Revelation 21:27).
Even still, the Bible insists God does not desire hell for anyone. “He is patient… not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance” (2 Peter 3:9). This is where divine love shines brightest: God, at great cost to Himself, made a way for us to avoid that horrific destiny. Jesus said hell was “prepared for the devil and his angels” (Matthew 25:41).
But if we persist in clinging to sin, we, too, go where sin must go: away from God.
Tim Keller, in The Reason for God, argues that “hell is simply one’s freely chosen path going on forever.” He likens it not to a dungeon God locks from the outside, but a trajectory of self-centeredness, pride, and isolation—chosen, nurtured, and solidified over time. “In short,” Keller writes, “hell is just a freely chosen identity apart from God on a trajectory into eternity.”
Others, including C.S. Lewis, taught similarly—that hell is not so much imposed as it is chosen. Lewis famously wrote, “There are only two kinds of people—those who say to God, ‘Thy will be done,’ and those to whom God says, ‘Thy will be done.’”
Hell is locked from the inside.
This publication is freely available to all and sustained through reader support.
If you wish to support Scott Sauls Weekly and receive bonus content:
If someone spends their life saying “I want nothing to do with God,” what would it imply for God to drag them into His presence forever? That wouldn’t be love—it would be coercion. Hell is, in a tragic sense, the ultimate honoring of human freedom. God respects our dignity enough to let us choose—even when that choice defies Him.
We see this dynamic play out in life. A person who repeatedly hardens their heart, indulges selfishness, and rejects love can become deeply embittered and isolated. Imagine that trajectory continued into eternity—that’s a picture of hell. Not torture inflicted from outside, but self-imposed alienation from the source of all joy and goodness.
Still, we struggle with the severity. Is eternal hell really a fair punishment for sins committed in a finite life? This objection makes sense—until we consider the holiness of God. Sin, at its core, is not just breaking rules—it’s the creature saying to the Creator, “I don’t want You.” That rejection of infinite goodness has infinite gravity. Even in human courts, we sometimes assign life sentences for split-second crimes—not because of their duration, but their depth. Likewise, hell may not be about a one-time offense, but an ongoing state of resistance to God.
And the generous, sometimes scandalous news of the gospel is that Jesus endured hell so we would never have to.
This is the heart of Christian hope. On the cross, Jesus cried, “My God, why have You forsaken me?” (Mark 15:34). That cry echoes the forsakenness of hell. In Him, God absorbed the judgment we deserved. Justice was satisfied. Love was proven. And now, as John 3:16–18 says, salvation is offered freely. Condemnation is not imposed on the unwilling—it’s the state we’re in if we refuse the lifeboat God provides.
Some ask, “How could I be happy in heaven knowing someone I love isn’t there?” That’s a deeply painful thought, is it not? The Bible doesn’t give us full clarity, but it does say that in eternity, our understanding and our hearts will be made whole. We’ll see as God sees, and we’ll trust His justice perfectly (Genesis 18:25). God is more compassionate than we are—so if He consents to someone remaining lost, it’s not because He lacked love, but because He honored a will that stubbornly refused Him.
It’s also worth noting that Jesus talked about hell more than anyone else in Scripture. He did so not because He relished the idea, but because He wanted us to avoid it. His warnings were expressions of love—like a parent yelling for a child to get out of a burning house. His tone is urgent because His motive is protection. Jesus spoke often and vividly about hell—not to scare us needlessly, but to awaken us to spiritual danger and offer us a way out. His warnings are not born of harshness, but of a love willing to shout when whispering won’t do.
This love—and its counterpart, justice—is illustrated even in the darkest chapters of history. An example of this is the sobering story of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss. After orchestrating mass death during the Holocaust, Höss was eventually captured, tried, and sentenced to death. In his final days, he was visited by a Jesuit priest. Höss confessed his sins, received communion, and requested a crucifix for his execution. Many were understandably horrified—could such a man really be forgiven?
But the gospel insists that if even someone like Höss turned in sincere repentance, then yes—grace can reach the deepest evil. Yet if he had clung to pride and defiance to the end, the same gospel would affirm God’s justice in allowing him to remain separated forever. That is the weight—and wonder—of divine mercy and holiness. The cross makes both possible: full pardon for the repentant and righteous judgment for the unrepentant.
Keller captures this paradox clearly:
“If we insist on keeping control of our lives, God will let us do that. That is hell—to be left to ourselves. Everyone who goes to hell chooses it. Without that self-choice it isn’t hell. Hell is the greatest monument to human freedom.”
In other words, hell is not the contradiction of God’s love—it is its tragic corollary. A love that honors human dignity must allow for the possibility of rejection and its consequences.
Think of it like this: if a governor offers a pardon to every guilty prisoner, but some refuse it because they will not admit guilt, is the governor unloving? Or imagine a party where invitations go out to all, but some decline because they despise the host—would dragging them in be the right move?
Ultimately, hell is self-exclusion. God offers heaven. We choose hell by rejecting it and saying, “Not Thy will, but mine be done.” And this, paradoxically, upholds God’s love. God’s warnings are not threats from a capricious ruler—they are the cries of a Savior who weeps over Jerusalem, who died for His enemies, who delays judgment so more can be awakened and come home.
This is a hard doctrine. Many faithful Christians wrestle with it. And yet, the truth we can all agree on this: any state apart from God’s presence is unspeakably tragic.
But here is our hope. No one ends up in hell unloved. And what’s more, Christ bore the pains of hell so we wouldn’t have to. “God did not send His Son to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved” (John 3:17). Those who reject Him remain in the condemnation they’ve chosen (John 3:18–19). But the invitation is there for the receiving. The lifeboat is here, and His name is Jesus.
So yes—a loving God can send people to hell. Not because He’s cruel, but because He’s holy, just, and also unwilling to override our freedom. His love is fierce and self-giving, not flimsy and permissive. He grieves, weeps, and takes no pleasure when any person chooses the path of rejection. And for those who trust Him, He promises rescue, renewal, and the joy of being fully known and fully loved, from now into eternity.
How Can I Serve You?
For speaking inquiries, leadership coaching, or team enrichment, visit scottsauls.com.
Thank you for this, it was refreshing to read. This is such a hard doctrine, bringing so many emotions and so much baggage with it as well. Thank you for your faithful, Scriptural, gentle but clear writing on this.
Scott, thank you for your words and for quoting words of other theologians who have spoken and written on this very heady subject. Your article will help me articulate in a clearer and more concise way to unbelievers and believers who struggle with this topic.